

What We Found Under the Floor
When the floor came up, the joists, the beams under them, and the decking on top had all deteriorated in the closed crawlspace. BEC Engineers and Consultants assessed the structure and found the problem went past the rot: several of the 4-by-6 support beams, spanning about 12 feet 6 inches, 14 feet, and 21 feet, were overstressed by about 20 to 75 percent against the structural criteria.
The photos show the opened floor and one of the deteriorated beams beneath it.


Investigate First, Then Lift the House
The homeowners chose to keep the house and its layout rather than take it down and build again, a decision they expected to save more than $1 million against demolition and new construction. The first engineering approach was a conventional one: rebuild the pier-and-beam system with treated lumber and new 10-inch concrete piers. We obtained three estimates for it, each in the neighborhood of $250,000, and they shared a weakness: the house would still sit on a wood floor over a closed crawlspace.
So we asked a different question. MLA Geotechnical drilled two borings, to about 9 and 14 feet, and found low-plasticity clay over limestone with low shrink-swell and settlement potential and no groundwater, which gave the engineers a basis for a soil-supported concrete floor. With BEC and Myers Concrete of Wimberley, the plan became: support and level the house, fill the crawlspace, and pour a reinforced slab on top of it. The house was lifted on 20-ton hydraulic jacks and concrete support blocks of about 3,500 PSI, leveled by laser, and the deteriorated rim beam at the edge of the house was exposed and replaced.


The Crawlspace Was Filled, Then Left to Cure
With the house supported, engineered flowable fill was pumped into the roughly three-foot crawlspace around the existing piers. Flowable fill is a self-leveling cementitious material that is pumped in as a liquid and sets into a stable base. Across the project, the fill and the concrete came to about 360 cubic yards in roughly 36 truckloads, placed by pump truck under a standing house.
The fill cured for about 14 days. Then rebar was laid over it, and concrete was pumped in to form the reinforced slab.


A 4-Inch Slab Where the Wood Subfloor Had Been
The new slab is a 4-inch reinforced concrete topper poured over the fill and the rebar, inside the standing walls of the house. Because the house had already moved, the floor elevations were set by laser and coordinated with the existing walls, windows, and doors. The concrete was pumped in, screeded level, and power-troweled to a flat surface.
The wood subfloor was never rebuilt and the crawlspace no longer exists. The finished tile was set on a decoupling membrane over the slab, installed to accommodate movement between the concrete and the tile, given the house's history of failed tile.


The Rear Stem Wall, Rebuilt and Faced in Limestone
The stem wall along the back of the house had been compromised with the floor. We rebuilt it, rebuilt the exterior and rear interior wall sections that had shifted, straightened and leveled them, and removed and reinstalled the windows as the structure was realigned. The new wall is faced in limestone with curved stone steps at the back door.
Because trapped humidity caused the damage, drainage got its own scope: French drains were installed, positive drainage around the house followed the geotechnical recommendation, and a gravel drainage strip runs along the outside of the wall.


The Rooms Went Back Together on the New Floor
With the slab cured, the house was put back together: new flooring with the tile on a decoupling membrane, the kitchen with its two islands, the living room around its stone fireplace, the game room, the front entry with its new arched pivot door, the primary suite, two guest bedrooms, three and a half baths, and the rear patio.
The layout the homeowners lived with stayed the same, and they were home for Thanksgiving 2023.


















